Monday, 8 December 2008
Sunday, 28 September 2008

Notable Games:
J.Blackburne - A.Puller,J.Blackburne - C.Hanson ,J.Mieses - F.J.Marshall (1902) ,J.Mieses - F.J.Marshall (1903) ,J.Mieses - M.Chigorin ,J.Mieses - H.Pillsbury ,J.Mieses - G.Maroczy ,J.Mieses - A.Albin ,J.Mieses - M.Chigorin
,J.Mieses - A.Rubinstein ,J.Mieses - F.I.Dus Chotimirsky,F,Marshall - J.R.Capablanca ,F,Marshall - S.Mlotkowsky ,A.Alekhine - V.Rozanov ,A.Alekhine - K.Isakov ,A.Alekhine - A.Cheron,A.Alekhine - Molina,A.Alekhine - A.P.Salamanca
H.Lindehn - W.Steinitz
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Bc4 Bc5 5.c3 Qe7 6.0-0 dxc3 7.Nxc3 ...
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.c3 dxc3 5.Nxc3 ...Remarkably enough, the idea to sacrifice just one pawn (Nxc3) is older in the Göring Gambit than in the Danish. Paul Morphy encountered it at the first USA-Congress of 1857 against Alexander Meek. In the Danish, especially Alexander Alekhine applied 1.e4 e5 2.d4 exd4 3.c3 dxc3 4.Nxc3, but on unimportant occasions.
1.e4 e5 2.d4 exd4 3.c3 dxc3 ....
4...d6 5.Bc4 Nc6 6.Nf3 (Göring Gambit, by transposition)
4...Bc5 5.Bc4 Nc6 6.Nf3 (Göring Gambit, by transposition)
4...Nc6 5.Bc4 and 6.Nf3 (Göring Gambit, by transposition)
[C44] - Scotch, Goring Gambit, Bardeleben Variant
1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 d4 exd4 4 c3 dxc3 5 Nxc3 Bb4 6 Bc4 Nf6
[C44] Scotch Gambit
1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 d4 exd4 4 Bc4
[C44] Scotch Gambit, Anderssen (Paulsen / Suhle) Counter Attack
1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 d4 exd4 4 Bc4 Bc5 5 0-0 d6 6 c3 Bg4
[C44] Scotch Gambit
1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 d4 exd4 4 Bc4 Bc5 5 Ng5
[C44] Scotch Gambit, Cochrane-Shumov Defense
1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 d4 exd4 4 Bc4 Bc5 5 Ng5 Nh6 6 Nxf7 Nxf7 7 Bxf7+ Kxf7 8 Qh5+ g6 9 Qxc5 d5
[C44] Scotch Gambit, Vitzhum Attack
1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 d4 exd4 4 Bc4 Bc5 5 Ng5 Nh6 6 Qh5
[C44] Scotch Gambit
1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 d4 exd4 4 Bc4 Bb4+
[C44] Scotch Gambit, Hanneken Variant
1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 d4 exd4 4 Bc4 Bb4+ 5 c3 dxc3 6 0-0 cxb2 7 Bxb2 Nf6 8 Ng5 0-0 9 e5 Nxe5
[C44] Scotch Gambit
1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 d4 exd4 4 Bc4 Bb4+ 5 c3 dxc3 6 bxc3
[C44] Scotch Gambit, Cochrane Variant
1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 d4 exd4 4 Bc4 Bb4+ 5 c3 dxc3 6 bxc3 Ba5 7 e5
[C44] Scotch Gambit, Benima Defense
1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 d4 exd4 4 Bc4 Be7
4...Bb4 5.Bc4 (5.Qd4 is an independent option) Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 d6 7.Qb3 Qe7 8.Ne2 Alekhine-Pomar, clock simul Madrid 1943
1.e4 e5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 dxc3:
4.Bc4 (Lindehn's continuation)
4...d6 5.Nxc3 (also Göring Gambit, by transposition)
4...cxb2 5.Bxb2
5...Bb4+ 6.Kf1 or 6.Nc3
5...d6 6.Qb3
5...d5 (Schlechter Defense)
Alekhine recommended that White play 4.Nxc3. This line often transposes into the Göring Gambit of the Scotch Game. There are only few lines with Black omitting ...Nc6 and/or White omitting Nf3.
White can instead offer a second pawn with 4.Bc4. The second pawn can be safely declined by transposing into the Scotch Gambit. Accepting the pawn allows White's two bishops to rake the Black kingside after 4...cxb2 5.Bxb2. White will often follow up with Qb3 if possible, applying pressure on Black's b7 and f7 squares. Combined with White's long diagonal pressure on g7, this can make it difficult for Black to develop his bishops.
1.e4 e5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 dxc3 4.Bc4 cxb2 5.Bxb2 ...
Schlechter recommended the most reliable defense for Black; by returning one of the pawns with 5...d5 Black gains time to complete development. After 6.Bxd5 Nf6 (Bb4+ is also possible) 7.Bxf7+ Kxf7 8.Qxd8 Bb4+ 9.Qd2 Bxd2+ 10.Nxd2..., Black regains the queen.
1.e4 e5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 dxc3 4.Bc4 cxb2 5.Bxb2 d5 6.Bxd5 Nf6 7.Bxf7+ Kxf7+ 8.Qxd8 Bb4+ 9.Qd2 Bbd2+ 10.Nxd2 ...
Most theorists evaluate this position as equal, but some believe that the queenside majority gives Black the advantage in the endgame. There have been attempts, especially by German correspondence player Ingo Firnhaber, to revive the gambit idea with 7.Nc3. The critical line is 7...Nxd5 8.Nxd5 Nbd7 (8...c6?? 9.Nf6+) 9.Nf3 c6 10.0-0 cxd5 11.exd5 Be7!
If White instead plays 6.exd5, his light-square bishop is blocked and after 6...Nf6 7.Nc3 Bd6 Black can complete development relatively easily.
The popularity of the Danish plummeted after Schlechter's defense was introduced as the resulting positions are not what White generally desires from a gambit opening. The big advantage of Göring's move order (2.Nf3 first) is avoiding exactly Schlechter's defence.
The big advantage of 2.d4 is the option to play a modification of Capablanca's Defence with exd4 3.c3 d5 4.exd5 Qxd5 5.cxd4 Nc6 6.Be3 instead of 6.Nf3 transposing.
1.e4 e5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 d5 4.exd5 Qxd5 5.cxd4 Nc6 6.Be3 ...

1.e4 e5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 d5 4.exd5 Qxd5 5.cxd4 Nc6 6.Nf3 ...
![]()
VIDEO #1
.
VIDEO #2
VIDEO #3
VIDEO #4

